online edition

The Student Newspaper of Hopkins School

    • Students illegally use their phones in the library during the 25-26 school year. Image credit: Beatrix Vassilev.

New Phone Rules for 2026-27: Hopkins Unplugged

Giuliana Wright '29 Assistant News Editor
On July 22 in an email to the Hopkins community, Head of School Matt Glendinning announced the new phone policy for the 2026-27 school year based on feedback from the students, staff and parents.
The resulting policy, which Glendinning outlined in his letter, states: "From 8 a.m. to 3:30 p.m., in all areas of campus, cell phones must be turned off or silenced and stored entirely out of sight; Phones may be accessed and used only when explicitly permitted by a teacher for a specific academic activity; Accessories like smartwatches may be worn but must not be accompanied by active phone use; Students who require a device for medical reasons will be fully accommodated. Families should contact their head adviser to initiate dialogue about  accommodation."

Glendinning wrote that the goal of the new policy is to “encourage greater, meaningful interpersonal connection, and to disconnect students from the ever-present pressure and distraction of social media.”

Last year, Glendinning said, “there was a community expectation that students would not use their phones during class time or for non-academic purposes.” Head advisers discussed the idea of a new policy in response to what Glendinning described as “continuously seeing students on their phones.” According to Glendinning, Dean of Students Lars Jorgensen “then took the head advisers’ comments and concerns to the Administrative Board.”

In a spring survey sent to the Hopkins community, Glendinning said, “a significant majority of parents and teachers” responding expressed “a strong desire for a stricter approach.” Though “most students disagreed,” Glendinning wrote, “many acknowledged their overreliance on phones, noting the impact on attention and sleep.”

Although the new policy is meant to limit distractions from screens, some students questioned its potential effectiveness. Lina Elwood ’28 noted that “people who want to work around it will work around it. We all have laptops or other means of accessing social media, gaming or any of the things they want to avoid.” Glendinning explained that the goal of the policy is to “improve student well-being” rather than eliminating technology use.

Kia Bourne ’29 said, “The limit should be enforced in strictly academic spaces. If students don't want to do their
work on campus, I think that’s their responsibility. That’s how students develop their own sense of work-life balance.”

Glendinning said, “We regret if some students feel it is an intrusion on their autonomy and independence, but
the intention is to be helpful, and school after school has reported that it is.” Head Adviser Joshua Young said, “The school has also adopted a new schedule this year that gives students more built-in, free/flex time than they have had in the past and there are very few other restrictions on how you spend that time.”

Several students brought up contacting parents and peers as an issue. Richard Helmy ’29 said, “I have to use my
phone pretty often so that I can schedule pickups. That will be considerably harder.” Camille Bahr ’28 noted that the “only time” she had seen students use their phones in class was “to text a parent.”

In his letter, Glendinning noted, “The biggest adjustment will be managing day-to-day coordination between students, parents, and leaders of various teams and clubs.” Because all Hopkins students carry laptops, Glendinning said, “such ordinary logistical communication can be handled via school email.” Young said, “Parents can always call the main desk or head advisers' offices to leave messages for students.”

In his letter, Glendinning emphasized that the benefits of the change would outweigh the challenges. “So
many schools and students have shared their experience with cell phone bans, and almost universally they indicate that students come to appreciate the positive impact,” Glendinning wrote. “The challenge, of course, is that it’s hard to foresee or believe in such positive outcomes before implementation of a ban.”
Back
Editor in Chief 
Anjali van Bladel

Managing Editor 
Mary Winter Szarabajka 

Content Editor
Olivia Yu

News
Rose Porosoff
Sonali Bedi 
Gitanjali Navaratnam-Tomayko
Lena Wang
August Farouki
Giuliana Wright
Elyssa Power
Features
Aurelia Wen
Ashley Deng
Ari Mehta
Clarissa Castilho
Alia Mojibian
Jensen Rodriguez
 
Arts
Saisha Ghai
Karolina Jasaitis
Isha Seth
Margot Beckerlegge
Jean Wen
Victoria Morris
Op/Ed
Rebecca Li
Bea Lundberg
Ellie Luo
Leila Chaar
Anya Huang
Keegan Slovinski

Sports
Elaina Pakutka
Beckett Ehrlich
Lukas Roberts
Silvia Gozar-Zimbrean
John O'Connell
Isaac Lin
Cartoonist
Susie Becker 
Faculty Advisers
Stephen May
Elizabeth Gleason
Isabelle Wendt
The Razor's Edge reflects the opinion of 4/5 of the editorial board and will not be signed. The Razor welcomes letters to the editor but reserves the right to decide which letters to publish, and to edit letters for space reasons. Unsigned letters will not be published, but names may be withheld on request. Letters are subject to the same libel laws as articles. The views expressed in letters are not necessarily those of the editorial board.
     
The Razor,
 an open forum publication, is published monthly during the school year by students of: 
Hopkins School
986 Forest Road
New Haven, CT 06515

Phone: 203.397.1001 x628
Email: smay@hopkins.edu