online edition

The Student Newspaper of Hopkins School

    • It's easy for anyone to make a podcast these days.

To Pod or Not to Pod?

Beatrice Lundberg '27 Assistant Op/Ed Editor
Over this past summer, you could usually find me and my sister cruising ten miles over the speed limit, melted iced lattes in hand, laughing hysterically at the witty stories and jokes told on Mary Beth Barone and Benito Skinner’s Ride Pod. Although many people would have preferred to be bumping Zach Bryan or some “wind in your hair” driving music, we—like many other people—decided to hop on the podcast trend.
Podcasts are a form of media that gained most of their traction after the Covid pandemic. They come in a variety of genres: comedy, true crime, wellness, and most popularly, news. I love podcasts, especially when they provide a level of humility and humor from your favorite celebrities. However, much of this form of media has begun to take a turn for the worse, creating a whirlwind of misinformation. As podcasts start to increasingly function as informal news sources, their impact has outpaced the accountability structures that traditionally govern journalism.  

The problem with podcasts is that they are easy to make and even easier to access. Anyone can buy a mic setup and a computer, making it possible to spew piping hot political takes and unverified claims while influencing tens of millions of listeners (unlike formal news standards, where journalists are expected to be accurate, fair, and thorough with their reporting). 

A great example of this is Joe Rogan on the Joe Rogan Experience. Although a lot of his episodes are interviews and discussions of current events, he has been known to spread misinformation (especially during the pandemic) and to change his opinions frequently. A great example of this is his recent opposition to Donald Trump, despite having endorsed him in the 2024 election.

I’m not saying that people like Joe Rogan are the issue– ninety percent of the time they are just expressing their opinions. It is the fact that the unresearched comments they make on a whim can have a massive impact on their large demographic who hangs onto their every word. When influential hosts speculate without clear evidence, those statements can begin to circulate as fact amongst their devoted audiences. 

According to a 2025 Pew Research Center study, 54% of all adults listen to podcasts, and 67% of people aged from 18 to 29 listen to them as well. These numbers highlight the fact that podcasts are not a niche form of entertainment; they are a dominant source of information for most Americans, especially young adults. Applications such as Spotify or Apple Music should do a better job of calling out falsehoods and fact checking what people say due to the sheer volume of listeners. The study also found that 31% of politically right wing listeners and 15% of politically left wing listeners trust the news they get from podcasts as much as the news they get from other sources. When nearly one-third of right-leaning listeners place podcast news on par with traditional reporting, it underscores how seriously this medium is taken. 

Most people tend to engage in forms of media that support their existing political beliefs. This reality supports the concerns that podcasting without fact checks can be dangerous. Fake news spreads quickly through digital echo-chambers, where audiences solely encounter the perspectives that reinforce the ideas they already believe. 

At the same time, the accessibility of podcasts is what makes them such a great vessel of entertainment and information. They allow anyone to express themselves and their opinions freely, without being limited by big broadcasting networks or traditional cooperations. 

As much as the responsibility of sharing accurate information falls onto hosts, listeners also must develop media literacy and critical thinking skills in this new age of content. Doing your own research and informing yourself is just as significant as listening to other perspectives. We must look inward to our own belief systems and moral compasses to discern between what is right and wrong. 

This summer, blasting the Ride Pod felt harmless: and for the most part that is what podcasts are meant to be – carefree and fun. However, as they continue to dominate the landscape of media, the lines are beginning to blur between commentary and journalism. When the words of hosts are being heard by millions of people, their opinions begin to carry real weight. Podcasts are great because they are accessible and unfiltered – but that same freedom brings a responsibility to the platforms, audiences, and creators that take part in them.
Back
Editor in Chief 
Liliana Dumas 

Managing Editor 
Miri Levin 

News
Sarah Solazzo 
Rose Porosoff
Anvi Pathak 
Lena Wang
Sonali Bedi 
Features
Abby Rakotomavo
Elona Spiewak
Becky Li
Ashley Deng
Aurelia Wen
 
Arts
Aerin O’Brien
Saisha Ghai
Veena Scholand
Ellie Luo
Isha Seth
Op/Ed
Rain Zheng
Winter Szarabajka
Anjali van Bladel
Gitanjali Navaratnam-Tomayko
Bea Lundberg

Sports
Samantha Bernstein
Hana Beauregard
Elaina Paktuka
Beckett Ehrlich
Lukas Roberts
Content
Amelia Hudonogov-Foster
Edel Lee
Micah Betts
Ari Mehta
Olivia Yu
Karolina Jasaitis 

Cartoonists
Susie Becker 
Faculty Advisers
Stephen May
Elizabeth Gleason
Shanti Madison
The Razor's Edge reflects the opinion of 4/5 of the editorial board and will not be signed. The Razor welcomes letters to the editor but reserves the right to decide which letters to publish, and to edit letters for space reasons. Unsigned letters will not be published, but names may be withheld on request. Letters are subject to the same libel laws as articles. The views expressed in letters are not necessarily those of the editorial board.
     
The Razor,
 an open forum publication, is published monthly during the school year by students of: 
Hopkins School
986 Forest Road
New Haven, CT 06515

Phone: 203.397.1001 x628
Email: smay@hopkins.edu